Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki) ; 43(3): 61-66, 2022 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2154571

ABSTRACT

Carnitine palmitoyltransferase II deficiency (CPT II) is an autosomal recessive inherited disorder of long-chain fatty acid oxidation in the mitochondrial matrix, resulting in an inability to utilize fat for energy in cells. The most frequent myopathic form occurs in young adults and is associated with recurrent episodes of exercise-induced rhabdomyolysis. The myopathic form is caused by the Ser113Leu mutation of the CPT II gene. Rarely, massive rhabdomyolysis could be complicated by acute kidney injury (AKI), cardiomyopathy, and respiratory insufficiency. We present a case of an 18-year old male with myalgia, muscular weakness, and dark-colored urine after prolonged exercise and a recent mildSARS-CoV-2infection. Massive rhabdomyolysis was diagnosed with markedly increased serum concentrations of myoglobin and creatine kinase, with normal kidney function. The patient experienced two similar episodes in the years 2017 and 2018, with rhabdomyolysis and AKI treated with hemodialysis. After excluding autoimmune and infectious diseases as causes of recurrent rhabdomyolysis, the patient was genetically tested and Ser113Leu mutation of the CPT II gene was confirmed. When a patient presents with myalgia and dark-colored urine triggered by minor physical activities, genetic testing for possible CPT II deficiency should be initiated. TheSARS-CoV-2infection could be a factor that triggers the occurrence of rhabdomyolysis and aggravates the severity of the attack in patients with CPT II deficiency.

2.
Blood ; 138(19):994-994, 2021.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1989899

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Since the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic, efforts have been made to understand the importance of broadly neutralising natural antibodies in determining the response to SARS-CoV-2. Previous studies have shown that allelic variants of the IGHV1-69 gene play a dominant role in protective natural antibody responses to several other viral pathogens, including influenza virus, hepatitis C virus, human immunodeficiency virus and, most notably, the SARS-CoV-2-related viruses SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. These allelic variants are commonly known as 51p1-related and differ from the other IGHV1-69 alleles (known as hv1263-related) in the presence of a Phe54 residue in the CDR2 region. Importantly, crystallographic studies have shown that the Phe54 residue is critical for the binding of IGHV1-69 antibodies to the SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV spike proteins. In this study, we evaluated the prevalence of 51p1 and hv1263 alleles and the clonality of 51p1- and hv1263-expressing B cells in a large cohort of healthy individuals and COVID-19 patients and correlated the findings with the severity of the disease. Мaterials and methods: A total of 419 samples were included in the study, of which 78 asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic individuals, 200 hospitalized patients with severe disease, 94 critically ill patients and 47 healthy donors. Peripheral blood was collected 8-20 days after the onset of symptoms and total cellular RNA was extracted from whole blood using an automated procedure. Аllelle-specific Ig-gene fingerprinting of IgM heavy chain transcripts was used to simultaneously analyse the clonality of the IgM+ B-cell population and the clonality of the 51p1- and hv1263-expressing B cell populations. The significance of the differences in the prevalence of clonal B-cell populations between healthy donors and patients and between patients with different severity of the disease was calculated with the Chi-Square test. Results: Analysis of the clonality of the IgM+ B-cell population showed a polyclonal pattern in most of the investigated healthy individuals (33/47, 70%) but in only 20% of all SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals (75/372, p<0.001). A significant difference was also observed between mildly affected and severely/critically ill patients [31/78 (39.7%) vs. 44/294 (15%), respectively) (p<0.001)], but not between severely and critically ill patients [28/200 (14,%) vs. 16/94 (17,1%), (p=n.s.)]. No 51p1 transcripts were detected in 74/372 (19.9%) of SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals and in 14/47 (29,8%) of the control group (p>0,01), while hv1263 transcripts were not detected in 155/289 (53,6%) and in 27/47 (68,6%) tasted patients and controls, respectively (p>0,05). We did not find a statistically significant difference in the prevalence of 51p1 and hv1263 alleles between patients with different disease severity. However, a significantly higher number of patients displayed clonal expansions of 51p1- or hv1263-expressing B cells (219/372(58.9%) and 118/244 (48,4%), respectively in comparison to healthy donors [5/47(10.6%) and 7/47(14.9%), respectively]. There was no statistically significant difference between mildly affected and severely/critically ill patients in the clonallity status of 51p1- 38/61 (62,3%) and 182/237 (76,7%) respectively or between hv1263- expressing B cells in the same two groups of patients [20/25 (80%) and 98/109 (89,9%), p>0.05]. Conclusions: Our results show that SARS-CoV-2 infection stimulates clonal expansions of IGHV1-69 -expressing B-cells, but this is independent of the severity of the disease. In addition, no difference in the prevalence of IGHV1-69 alleles was observed between patients at different stages of the disease, indicating that natural neutralizing antibodies encoded by this gene are not an important determinant of COVID-19 severity and progression. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

3.
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki) ; 42(1): 5-18, 2021 Apr 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1204182

ABSTRACT

The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has generated the largest global health crisis of the 21st century, evolving into accelerating socioeconomic disruption. In spite of all rapidly and widely emerging scientific data on epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of the COVID-19 disease, severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is continuing to propagate in lack of definitive and specific therapeutic agents. Current therapeutic strategies are mainly focused on viral inhibition by antiviral drugs and hampering the exuberant immune response of the host by immunomodulatory drugs. In this review, we have studied the reports of the largest clinical trials intended to COVID-19 treatment published during the first year of the pandemics. In general, these results concentrate on seven therapeutic options: remdesivir, chloroguine/hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir-ritonavir combination, corticosteroids, tocilizumab, convalescent plasma and monoclonal antibodies. In line with the reviewed data, as of January 2021, most of the evidence support the use of remdesivir in hospitalized patients with moderate and severe forms of the disease and provide reliable data on the substantial beneficial effect of corticosteroids in patients requiring supplemental oxygen. Moreover, preliminary RECOVERY trial results have demonstrated the efficacy of tociluzumab in the treatment of critically ill patients. The reports presenting the outcomes of the other immune-based therapies under investigation are enthusiastically awaited.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Adenosine Monophosphate/analogs & derivatives , Adenosine Monophosphate/therapeutic use , Alanine/analogs & derivatives , Alanine/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , COVID-19/therapy , Chloroquine/therapeutic use , Clinical Trials as Topic , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Drug Combinations , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Immunization, Passive , Lopinavir/therapeutic use , Ritonavir/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Serotherapy
4.
Blood ; 137(10): 1365-1376, 2021 03 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1127679

ABSTRACT

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is characterized by the existence of subsets of patients with (quasi)identical, stereotyped B-cell receptor (BcR) immunoglobulins. Patients in certain major stereotyped subsets often display remarkably consistent clinicobiological profiles, suggesting that the study of BcR immunoglobulin stereotypy in CLL has important implications for understanding disease pathophysiology and refining clinical decision-making. Nevertheless, several issues remain open, especially pertaining to the actual frequency of BcR immunoglobulin stereotypy and major subsets, as well as the existence of higher-order connections between individual subsets. To address these issues, we investigated clonotypic IGHV-IGHD-IGHJ gene rearrangements in a series of 29 856 patients with CLL, by far the largest series worldwide. We report that the stereotyped fraction of CLL peaks at 41% of the entire cohort and that all 19 previously identified major subsets retained their relative size and ranking, while 10 new ones emerged; overall, major stereotyped subsets had a cumulative frequency of 13.5%. Higher-level relationships were evident between subsets, particularly for major stereotyped subsets with unmutated IGHV genes (U-CLL), for which close relations with other subsets, termed "satellites," were identified. Satellite subsets accounted for 3% of the entire cohort. These results confirm our previous notion that major subsets can be robustly identified and are consistent in relative size, hence representing distinct disease variants amenable to compartmentalized research with the potential of overcoming the pronounced heterogeneity of CLL. Furthermore, the existence of satellite subsets reveals a novel aspect of repertoire restriction with implications for refined molecular classification of CLL.


Subject(s)
Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains/genetics , Immunoglobulin Variable Region/genetics , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/genetics , Gene Frequency , Gene Rearrangement , Humans , Somatic Hypermutation, Immunoglobulin
5.
J Pharm Policy Pract ; 13: 61, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-781552

ABSTRACT

With a scientific background from filoviruses, paramyxoviruses, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV, remdesivir entered into the COVID-19 battle to become one of the favorable therapeutic candidates with potential antiviral activity in the treatment of this disease. Globally, remdesivir was accessed and investigated through clinical research (clinical trials) and clinical practice (compassionate use, expanded access, early access scheme, and emergency use). Currently, remdesivir approval status differs between states. This paper aims to review and analyze regulatory approaches for accessing and investigating remdesivir, by communicating regulatory variability between countries in terms of terminology, modalities, and protocols.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL